SEBLOD 2.0 @ Joomla! Day France 2011
Back from Joomla! Day France 2011, two very interesting days, as always...
We do not forget you and have brought some gifts to help you wait...
Because YES, the official release of SEBLOD 2.0 is April 19! So enjoy your last days on this site (before moving on www.seblod.com) and have a look on the videos!
Just a little update here:
The tagging system is done. It works great, and you will see that it's really powerful :)
When the next major 2.5 release is ready all the plugins/templates that we have prepared for you will be available on our website.
An "Ajax Availability" validation plug-in will be available in the next major release.
It will also be used on the component backend (when/where you create a Field), and a popup alert will let you know if the name is already taken..
Any news on this??
Great ! It's seems to work after your process :
1°) SEBLOD 2.3.6 is out, please upgrade first.
2°) Then yes, you can go to the "App Folder Manager" and click on the "Clear ACL" button.
It should fix the issue.
SEBLOD 2.3.6 is out, please upgrade first.
Then yes, you can go to the "App Folder Manager" and click on the "Clear ACL" button.
It should fix the issue.
If you still have an issue after that, i'd say to have a look directly using phpmyadmin, on both tables:
- if one entry is null (= 0) in "asset_id"
- if the "asset_id" (> 0) is missing in #__assets (column: id) or if its "parent_id" is null (= 0)
The bug can be partialy correcting with this process :
1°) In "Categories" tab : I've selected all and launch the "Rebuild" tool
2°) For each categories : I've edited it, and saved.
In my case, this process have corrected 2 form on 3. One of them can't be modified : always the same message "L'enregistrement a échoué avec l'erreur suivante : ID de parent invalide."
Yes this is already planned and will come soon. (but not in upcoming 2.3.0)
Moving this to "Tasks".
Thanks & Regards,
This is fixed.
Thanks & Regards,
Yes, like Nithin said there is no issue here. (fields coming from the selected Folder are added)
@Nithin, adding fields from subfolders could be a future improvement yes.
@Iwan, if you need a copy of "Article" content type.. use the "duplicate" feature at the bottom of the list.
I believe this is not issue. The fields in Default Article Content Type is scattered within sub folders. When you creating a new content type based on ‘Article’ folder, the fields directly stored in this folder will added automatically. The fields from sub folders will not add.
Eg: In my case, Article folder having 15 fields, all the 15 fields added while I am creating a new content type based on ‘Article’ folder.
But it would be nice, if SEBLOD having the option to add fields from subfolders, while creating a New Content Type. It should be an optional one while creating a new content type.
Ok.. this will come after GA. (item moved to "Task")
Thanks & Regards
Thank you for your comment.
The custom path was not proposed for the "site" form. In the next RC, we will fix this lack. Thus, in the next RC, we will put the custome path in the "site" form.
I've seen the same problem. If I give a new field a name that's already taken, Seblod allows me to go all the way through the process with no message.
Also, after creating the field, if I look in the parameters, it says the field is locked to content type A, even though it shows up in content type B.
As Saba said, I have started naming all my fields with a prefix indicating the content type. But there should be a message.
You can create your select using the following options:
and then apply the Html typo on the content like that:
Hi Georgi, This field has been improved a bit.
PrepareContent & PrepareStore can now be used. (upcoming GA) ($id, $name, $value, $fields, $config are available)
// PrepareContent $value = 'Hello world'; //(or else.. or leave it blank)
// PrepareForm $value = '...';
$form = '<input type="text" name="'.$name.'" id="'.$id.'" value="..." />';
// PrepareStore $value = 'Hello world'; //(or else.. or leave it blank)
Thanks & Regards, Saba.
The content type's name is now available from List/Item views.
(... in upcoming GA release)
Thanks & Regards,
Brilliant. I will try to make it redirect to a login that way, thanks.
The missing function "onCCK_Storage_LocationPrepareContent" has been added into the "Free" plugin. (coming in GA package)
Great, Thanks Saba.
A "Reset" button field will be available on the website, after GA release.
An additional option for current "Submit" button may come too..
Filter i see as when you can add/remove individual criteria to limit a result like here: http://www.comet.co.uk/c/Xbox-360/Xbox-360-Consoles-Packages/1881 on the left and also another approach here: http://www.ebuyer.com/store/Computer/cat/Laptops again on the left.
What i request here is basically the ability to not have a submit button and use the OnChange event of the search fields to reload the page with the new results.
Hello Markus, mm i think that on front end plugin are applied that's why you don't see this value... We must find a way to make a difference between a form and a content...
Thank you for clearning this up, it makes perfect sense, and I now know that I need to prefix them.
Field names must remain unique (even if the fields are in separate folders..).
Adding a prefix is the good way to use them.
But yes, a message should tell us that the name is already taken, and can't be used again.
(the message is already well displayed if the fields are created from Field Manager, but not from the Content Type edition page...... and of course it may be better using ajax like it was in the 1.8 version). This improvement will come.
Ok, after thinking about it I remembered that when I first created the textarea field in question, it was just a text field (I had changed it to textarea after first saving it as a text, which I am now remembering...).
So this time I created a new textarea field from the beginning, and you're right it is stored as TEXT (mysql text).
But changing the field type after its creation doesn't update the database. I'm sure this would be challenging to implement and is probably not a priority, but it is sometimes a little confusing.